<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sea Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2010/08/sea-sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2010/08/sea-sick/</link>
	<description>Creative Ideas for a Greener Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:57:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gelbard</title>
		<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2010/08/sea-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-18118</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gelbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservationmagazine.org/?p=10327#comment-18118</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised to see this article miss the fact that about 75% of antibiotics are in fact used on livestock, not people.

And in most cases, they are used to speed livestock growth, not merely to treat sick animals.

More on this shocking health and environmental threat here: http://www.nrdc.org/living/healthreports/keep-antibiotics-working.asp

No doubt there are a number of sources of the antibiotic resistance reported in this article, and we need science to do the careful work required to isolate and address each source.  

However, to overlook the use of three quarters of antibiotics -- a known driver of increasing antibiotic resistance -- is a glaring omission from this article.

Fortunately, NRDC and our partners are on the case, working to drive solutions: http://www.nrdc.org/media/2012/120323.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised to see this article miss the fact that about 75% of antibiotics are in fact used on livestock, not people.</p>
<p>And in most cases, they are used to speed livestock growth, not merely to treat sick animals.</p>
<p>More on this shocking health and environmental threat here: <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/living/healthreports/keep-antibiotics-working.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrdc.org/living/healthreports/keep-antibiotics-working.asp</a></p>
<p>No doubt there are a number of sources of the antibiotic resistance reported in this article, and we need science to do the careful work required to isolate and address each source.  </p>
<p>However, to overlook the use of three quarters of antibiotics &#8212; a known driver of increasing antibiotic resistance &#8212; is a glaring omission from this article.</p>
<p>Fortunately, NRDC and our partners are on the case, working to drive solutions: <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/media/2012/120323.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrdc.org/media/2012/120323.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Magnaghi</title>
		<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2010/08/sea-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Magnaghi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservationmagazine.org/?p=10327#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>Fantastic reporting! I was aware of this situation, but not to the extent reported. Nice concise condensing of the literature cited. As a new Marine Mammal Stranding Network biologist in California, I look for signs of infection and take precautions against contamination, but I will be taking this much more seriously now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic reporting! I was aware of this situation, but not to the extent reported. Nice concise condensing of the literature cited. As a new Marine Mammal Stranding Network biologist in California, I look for signs of infection and take precautions against contamination, but I will be taking this much more seriously now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2010/08/sea-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conservationmagazine.org/?p=10327#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed this article immensely. It opened up a perspective on the ocean that I had not sufficiently examined. Carefully written Ms Kessler reveals some troubling concerns about our relationship to marine life without resorting to hyperbolic rhetoric.  Thanks
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this article immensely. It opened up a perspective on the ocean that I had not sufficiently examined. Carefully written Ms Kessler reveals some troubling concerns about our relationship to marine life without resorting to hyperbolic rhetoric.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

