<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urban Chill Factor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2009/11/urban-chill-factor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2009/11/urban-chill-factor/</link>
	<description>Creative Ideas for a Greener Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:57:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GSP</title>
		<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2009/11/urban-chill-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>GSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/conmag/?p=4712#comment-236</guid>
		<description>What a fascinating article to challenge our preconceived notions about carbon storage.  I wouldn&#039;t take an article like this evidence of a &quot;cities good / jungles bad&quot; dichotomy nor would do I think that the author has forgotten about the myriad benefits of unspoiled tropical forests (this is Conservation Magazine, isn&#039;t it?)  However, unless you seriously advocate the preemptive removal (i.e. genocide) of billions of people then we should be glad that there is more evidence that cities can be part of a future where people live as efficiently as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fascinating article to challenge our preconceived notions about carbon storage.  I wouldn&#8217;t take an article like this evidence of a &#8220;cities good / jungles bad&#8221; dichotomy nor would do I think that the author has forgotten about the myriad benefits of unspoiled tropical forests (this is Conservation Magazine, isn&#8217;t it?)  However, unless you seriously advocate the preemptive removal (i.e. genocide) of billions of people then we should be glad that there is more evidence that cities can be part of a future where people live as efficiently as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto Gallardo</title>
		<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2009/11/urban-chill-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Gallardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/conmag/?p=4712#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Have you ever been in a jungle? There is more to consider than a single variable. Carbon is indeed important, but is not everything that matters. Just rememeber that a forest is more than the sum of the trees (or carbon!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever been in a jungle? There is more to consider than a single variable. Carbon is indeed important, but is not everything that matters. Just rememeber that a forest is more than the sum of the trees (or carbon!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberto Gallardo</title>
		<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2009/11/urban-chill-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Gallardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/conmag/?p=4712#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Have you ever been in a jungle? There is more to consider than a single variable. Carbon is indeed important, but is not everything that matters. Just rememeber that a forest is more than the sum of the trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever been in a jungle? There is more to consider than a single variable. Carbon is indeed important, but is not everything that matters. Just rememeber that a forest is more than the sum of the trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Gangur</title>
		<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2009/11/urban-chill-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Gangur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/conmag/?p=4712#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Tropical rainforests also don&#039;t harbour large populations of ravenous human consumers to generate nitrous and sulphurous oxides and other toxic wastes and virtually indiscriminately shread habitats of their resources.

Am I the only one who thinks this interpretation of data sounds like a piss-poor attempt to justify the environmental degradation associated with human growth and expansion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tropical rainforests also don&#8217;t harbour large populations of ravenous human consumers to generate nitrous and sulphurous oxides and other toxic wastes and virtually indiscriminately shread habitats of their resources.</p>
<p>Am I the only one who thinks this interpretation of data sounds like a piss-poor attempt to justify the environmental degradation associated with human growth and expansion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felipe Melo</title>
		<link>http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2009/11/urban-chill-factor/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Felipe Melo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/conmag/?p=4712#comment-232</guid>
		<description>This is wrong! How much carbon is emitted to build cities? Surely more than that stored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is wrong! How much carbon is emitted to build cities? Surely more than that stored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

